The Vitality of New Religions: Thinking Globally, Existing Locally
Baylor University
Waco (Texas), 5-8 June 2014
http://www.cesnur.org/2014/waco-cfp.htm
CALL FOR PAPERS
The 2014 CESNUR Conference will return to Waco, Texas, and Baylor University, where it will be hosted by the Institute for Studies on Religion. We welcome papers especially on this year’s theme:
“The Vitality of New Religions: Thinking Globally, Existing Locally”
As the 2013 CESNUR conference in Falun focused on the changing scene relative to new religions, this one will focus on space-the global visions projected by new religion and their attempts to embody their vision in local centers. With this theme in mind, we will welcome especially papers on new religious movements in Texas and the American Southwest, including but by no means limited to the Latter-day Saints, the House of Yahweh, Freemasonry, Barsana Dham, the Branch Davidians, and the Texas phase of various national and international new religions.
Papers will also be welcomed on
– 21st-century new, new religions
– Third generation new religions movements
– New religions operation as global networks
– And all those topics upon which you are currently conducting research in our usual, larger area.
Papers and sessions proposals should be submitted by E-mail before the close of business on 21 January 2014 to cesnur_to@virgilio.it, accompanied by an abstract of no more than 300 words and a CV of no more than 200 words. Proposals may be submitted either in English or in French.
The conference will begin on Wednesday evening with a reception and opening session, introducing Waco and Texas’ history of new religions which reaches back to Sam Houston and the founders of the Texas Republic. Did you know that Houston corresponded with Joseph Smith, Jr., on the relocation of the Saints to the Republic?
Conference sessions will run through the day on Thursday and Friday, through Saturday morning. Saturday afternoon will be a time for a local tour, which will focus on the Homestead Heritage community north of Waco, and will also provide for an optional visit to the Branch Davidian site.
Call for Proposals and Films
The Bodily and Material Cultures of Religious Subjectivation
The Bodily and Material Cultures of Religious Subjectivation
www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/anthropology-news/call-for-proposals-religious-subjectivation
Program Details
Intended date of conference: 17-18 June, 2014.
Venue: UCL, Dept. of Anthropology.*
Deadline for CFP: 31 December, 2013.
Conference Convenors: Jean-Pierre Warnier and Urmila Mohan.
For further information please contact Urmila Mohan (u.mohan.11@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:u.mohan.11@ucl.ac.uk).
Statement of Purpose
There is no known religious practice that does not involve bodily motions (bowing, standing, walking, fasting, feasting, etc.) and their associated emotions, nor the use of given material things (shrines, musical instruments, substances of various kinds). Both involve the sensory apparatus of touch, sight, smell, etc. Without disregarding religious discourses and creeds, the conference will focus on the cultures of religious practice with a strong emphasis on both ethnographic documentation and theoretical elaboration based on a few basic principles — the importance of Bodily and Material Culture, and Religious Subjectivation involving technologies of the self.
Call for Proposals and Films
We welcome proposals from students, faculty and independent researchers based on ethnographic fieldwork focused on both bodily and material cultures of religious practice as part of the production of a religious subject in different areas and religious settings (Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Asiatic, African and other religions, etc.). The papers should address theoretical issues, whatever theoretical references may be put to use, provided they articulate bodily and material cultures. We aim at establishing discussions between various academic traditions on both sides of the Atlantic and the Channel. Short documentary films (e.g. 20 min maximum as a rule) showing the intertwinement of bodily and material cultures in religious practice are welcome. The proposals (of ca. one page) should be addressed to the convenors. They will be assessed by the organizing committee of the conference. Ultimately, we expect to end up with an edited volume.
*This event is organised by UCL Anthropology<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropologytogether with the Interdisciplinary Research Group (GDRI) “Anthropology and Art History” http://www.quaibranly.fr/en/enseignement/research/the-gdri-anthropology-and-art-history.html
at the Musée du Quai Branly.
Call for Paper: Developing a sense of belonging in diverse societies: Hui-Muslims in China and Muslims in Europe
14-15 May 2014
Gülen Chair for Intercultural Studies
KU Leuven University, Belgium
www.gcis-kuleuven.com
Keynote Speakers: Hui-Muslims in China, Li Zhinong, Yunnan University Muslims in Europe: Jorgen Nielsen, Copenhagen University
Key words: Citizenship, Immigration, Translocality, Nation-State, Ethnic-religious identity, Memory
The aim of this workshop is to gather scholars who work on Hui-Muslims in China and Muslims in Europe to compare the similitudes and differences of identity practices. Hui are predominantly Chinese speaking Muslims in China’s vast territory. With a population of 10 million, they are also the most numerous recognized ethnic group in China. Muslims in Europe are hardly featured in international media, domestic politics, and scholarly discussions. Multiculturalism, radicalisation, immigration, integration, forced marriage are discussed through the Muslim visibility and presence in Europe. Recent debates on integration and secularism are focused on the ‘Muslim question’. In contrast to the focus on Muslims in Europe, there is a notable lack of interest in Muslims in China with the exception of the Uyghur community.
In this workshop, we want to study the impact of ethnic-religious interactions, state integration positions and policies to grasp the increasing influence of religious-collective-national expression of Muslims in the public sphere. We would like to examine the new patterns of expression and visibility of the Muslims in China and Europe. Tracing Muslim’s interaction with non-Muslims, this workshop investigates how Muslims encounters, accommodates and negotiates into different socio-political contexts in China and Europe.
A comparison between China and Europe provides a guide for analysis of different models. The workshop looks at the modes of organization of Muslims, their identity demands, social-cultural and religious dynamics of solidarity.
To examine Muslims’ ethnic-religious identifications in contemporary China and Europe, and trace in which ways Muslims develop a sense of belonging to the wider society, this international workshop will broadly focus (but also restrain the focus) on two topics: (1) the collective memory and identification of Muslims and (2) the interaction of Muslims with the local communities and the State.
– Creating Collective Memory and Identity (through festivals, food, other trivial identity markers): This part looks at the Muslim way of life and their practices within different contexts to understand how a Muslim memory is shaped and constructed. In this regard, we want to analyze the circulation of narratives, translocal practices among Muslims in Europe and in China to seek whether they create new patterns-mixtures of their self-presentation. As Muslims are not homogeneous groups both in Europe and China, ethnic-religious diversity enforces the diversification of Muslim identity and practices within various secular-national contexts. The aim is to observe the daily practices, narratives and strategies to figure out the dynamics through which Muslims formulate their self.
– Relations with other local ethnic-religious communities and with the State (exchange with different faith people, institutions, public authorities, citizenship models etc.) In this part, we want to understand the interaction of Muslims with non-Muslims, local communities and the state to adjust and to maintain their cultural-religious identity. The capacity of adjusting religious-political identity enables to study the citizenship rhetoric, community dynamics, and institutional structures. The different modes of dynamics between Muslims, non-Muslims and the State constitute the possible ways of pluralism and co-existence of differences. We examine the specific strategies and policies developed by Muslims and authorities to negotiate the citizenship and integration models.
Tuition Fees
There is no tuition fee for participants in the workshop programme. However, presenters and participants are expected to pay the costs of their travel and accommodation. The organizers have a reduced prize from ‘La Royale’ hotel in Leuven. The GCIS covers the meals and transportation in Belgium during the workshop.
Outcome
A proceedings book of the workshop will be printed and distributed in advance of the workshop itself.
Within six months à maximum 1 year of the event, an edited book will be produced and published by the GCIS with Leuven University Press, comprising some or all of the papers presented at the Workshop, at the condition that they pass a peer review organized by the publisher. The papers will be arranged and introduced, and to the extent appropriate, edited, by scholar(s) to be appointed by the Editorial Board. Copyright of the papers accepted to the Workshop will be vested in the GCIS.
Selection Criteria
The workshop will accept up to 15 participants, each of whom must meet the following requirements:
– have a professional and/or research background in related topics of the workshop; – be able to attend the entire programme.
Since the Workshop expects to address a broad range of topics while the number of participants has to be limited, writers submitting abstracts are requested to bear in mind the need to ensure that their language is technical only where it is absolutely necessary and the language should be intelligible to non-specialists and specialists in disciplines other than their own; and present clear, coherent arguments in a rational way and in accordance with the usual standards and format for publishable work.
Timetable
1. Abstracts (300-500 words maximum) and CVs (maximum 1 page) to be received by 1st October 2013.
2. Abstracts to be short-listed by the Editorial Board and papers invited by 7th October 2013. 3. Papers (3,000 words minimum – 5,500 words maximum, excluding bibliography) to be received by 1st March 2014.
4. Papers reviewed by the Editorial Board and classed as: Accepted – No Recommendations; Accepted – See Recommendations; Conditional Acceptance – See Recommendations; Not Accepted, by 20th March 2014. 5. Final papers to be received by 15th April 2014.
Workshop Editorial Board
Johan Leman, KU Leuven
Li Zhinong, Yunnan University
Erkan Toguslu, KU Leuven
Ching Lin Pang, KU Leuven
Workshop Co-ordinator
Erkan Toguslu, KU Leuven
Ding Yuan, Yunnan University – KU Leuven
Venue
KU Leuven University
The international workshop is organized by KU Leuven Gülen Chair for Intercultural Studies and Research Center for Studies of Chinese Southwest’s Borderland Ethnic Minorities of Yunnan University. It will be entirely conducted in English and will be hosted by KU Leuven Gülen Chair in Leuven.
Papers and abstract should be sent to Erkan Toguslu: erkan.toguslu@soc.kuleuven.be
For more information plz contact:
Erkan Toguslu
KU Leuven Gülen Chair for Intercultural Studies Parkstraat 45 – box 3615 3000 Leuven
CALL FOR PAPERS
RC22, ISA WORLD CONGRESS, YOKOHAMA 2014
Religious and Spiritual Capital:
Reproducing, Overcoming or Going Beyond Inequality?
Scholars exploring the function of religion and spirituality do not seem to reach agreement regarding the issue of inequality: some researchers identify religion and/or spirituality as factor/s in reproducing existing patterns of inequality, whereas other authors argue the opposite, that religion/spirituality contribute to overcoming social inequality. A third position is possible in this debate, expressed by a minority of authors who argue that religion/spirituality go beyond the issue of inequality because they point to something other than social order. These authors often interpret religion and spirituality in terms of gift.
This panel will focus on the understanding of religion/spirituality as forms of “capital” or gift, and will therefore investigate religious/spiritual capital in relation to inequality. We invite papers which approach these issues both theoretically and empirically.
Furthermore, we would like to draw attention to the fact that an increasing body of literature distinguishes between religion and spirituality as two opposing instances. Within journalism a kind of tradition has been developed in which “spirituality” is most often used with positive connotations when “religion” is used with negative implications. This reflects the developing wider societal reflex to regard religion as restrictive, whilst spirituality offers more open engagement with existential questions (e.g. with a popular slogan that one’s orientation could be “spiritual but not religious”). In theology “religion” most often still describes traditional dogmatological and institutional concerns, whereas “spirituality” refers to the wider and deeper, that is more experiential and more intuitive, aspects of religiosity. Recent developments in religious studies have shown that “religion” is in decline, whereas “spirituality” is on the rise.
Surprisingly, this differentiation is not entirely clear when it comes to identifying specific capital-type resources religion/spirituality give rise to. Much of the literature about religious/spiritual capital uses these terms interchangeably and fails adequately to explain the content underpinning the concepts. We encourage papers which can contribute to addressing specificities of religious and spiritual capital and relate them to the issue of inequality.
PLEASE SUBMIT A 200-300 WORD ABSTRACT AT THE ISA WEBSITE: http://www.isa-sociology.org/congress2014/rc/rc.php?n=RC22
ALSO SEND THE ABSTRACT TO:
ChristoLombaard@gmail.com
maria.haemmerli@unifr.ch
DEADLINE FOR ABSTRACT SUBMISSION: SEPTEMBER 30th 2013.
Session Chairs
Christo Lombaard teaches Christian Spirituality at the University of South Africa in Pretoria. His 2012 volume The Old Testament and Christian Spirituality (Atlanta, Georgia: Society of Biblical
Literature) has been awarded the 2013 Krister Stendahl prize by the Graduate Theological Federation, USA.
Maria Hämmerli is sociologist of religion and currently researches Orthodox Churches and their migration to traditionally non-Orthodox countries. She is currently editing a volume about Orthodox Identities in Contemporary Western Europe. Additionally, she takes great interest in broader issues related to religion and spirituality (see publication Religion and Spirituality between Capital and Gift). Maria Hämmerli is based at the Insitute of sociology, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland and at Religious studies department of the University of Fribourg.
Post-Secularism: Between Public Reason and Political Theology
A Special Issue of THE EUROPEAN LEGACY
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cele20/current
Guest Editors:
Camil Ungureanu (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona) Lasse Thomassen (Queen Mary, University of London)
This special issue is scheduled for late 2014.
CALL FOR PAPERS
In recent years, leading philosophers, including Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, and or John D. Caputo, have criticized “old-style”
secularism and proposed instead a post-secular model for understanding the relation of religion and democracy, faith and reason. There are however profound theoretical and practical divergences in the post-secular models proposed. First, what are the precise characteristics of post-secularism as a philosophical alternative? In what sense could it be said to break with secularism? Second, what are the practical political and legal consequences of adhering to a post-secular approach? From a critical theoretical perspective, Habermas focuses on a revised concept of public reason and deliberation in promoting an active interaction of democracy and religion. From a hermeneutical perspective, Taylor’s recent work centres on the new “conditions of belief” and the dilemmas inherent to both religious and atheist experience. In contrast, Caputo and Richard Kearney develop a Derridean aporetic understanding of the nexus of democracy and religion, faith and reason, whereas Hent de Vries, William Connolly and Simon Critchley reject Habermas’s rationalist approach and propose a distinct understanding of post-secularism by focusing on Schmitt’s and Benjamin’s re-appropriation of the tenets of Saint Paul in their political-theological works. Although these trends have been studied to some extent, there has been no sustained attempt so far to subject them to a comparative analysis that would more fully address the issue of “post-secularism.”
Our “Call for Papers” invites scholars to submit a study, with a comparative dimension, that addresses both the philosophical import and the practical-political effects of the post-secular alternative. The work of the following authors will be at the centre of our proposed special issue: Habermas, Taylor, Caputo, Critchley, Connolly, Gianni Vattimo, Jacques Derrida, Slavoj Žižek, Giorgio Agamben, and Jean-Luc Nancy. Comparative studies that focus on various religious traditions (Christian, Hindu, Islamic, Buddhist, Confucian, etc.) and theologians, and those that focus on the public role of religion in democracy (e.g., Rawls, Weithman, Wolterstorff) are particularly welcome.
Possible topics include, but are not limited to:
– Significance and varieties of post-secularism
– Open secularity, post-secularism or political theology?
– Deliberative post-secularism or political liberalism
– Post-secularism: religious imagination and practice (Christian, Islamic, Hindu, Confucian, Buddhist, etc.)
– Discussion of (legal, moral or political) practical cases from a post-secular perspective – Is political theology useful for re-thinking democracy?
– Varieties of political theology today
– Re-thinking the legacy of Saint Paul
– Visions of sovereignty: between proceduralism and political theology – Faith: religious? secular?
– Post-secularism and feminism
– The state of exception between deliberation and political decision – Rethinking solidarity from a post-secular perspective
Deadline for submissions: 27 October 2013 Length of essay: 6,000-8,000 words, including notes. (For the referencing style, please consult http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cele20/current).
Potential contributors are welcome to contact the editors to discuss their proposed essay.
Camil Ungureanu (camil.ungureanu@upf.edu)
Lasse Thomassen (l.thomassen@qmul.ac.uk)